Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 25(22): 7127-7134, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1552079

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The anxiety of life that comes with the pandemic process increases the health anxiety and the level of perceived stress. However, there are uncertainties about which individuals are more sensitive. This study aims to investigate the effects of alexithymic characteristics on health anxiety and perceived stress. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors invited the participants to study via social media and e-mail. The data of 793 individuals, aged 18-65, collected over the internet (Google Forms) between November and December 2020 were statistically evaluated. Evaluations were made with the sociodemographic data form, the General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12), the Health Anxiety Scale (HAS), the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). RESULTS: In mediation analyzes between TAS subscales and HAS, Difficulty in Identifying Feelings (DIF) most strongly predicted HAS (B=0.469, p<0.001) and indirectly affected HAS only through GHQ (CS: 0.08, B=0.108, SE:0.021, CI: 0.070, 0.153). However, both PSS (CS: 0.0128, B=0.084, SE:0.027, CI: 0.032, 0.139) and GHQ (CS: 0.02, B=0.139, SE:0.028, CI: 0.090, 0.198) played a mediating role between Difficulty Describing Feelings (DDF) and HAS. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that individuals with alexithymic features are more sensitive to stress during periods of health-related increased stress, such as pandemics, and that individuals with alexithymic features should be given priority in psychotherapeutic interventions.


Subject(s)
Affective Symptoms/psychology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , COVID-19/psychology , Adult , Affective Symptoms/diagnosis , Affective Symptoms/therapy , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Internet/instrumentation , Male , Middle Aged , Psychotherapy/methods , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Surveys and Questionnaires , Turkey/epidemiology
2.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; 14(5): 635-637, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-208996

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the readability of information on the Internet posted about coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to determine how closely these materials are written to the recommended reading levels. METHODS: Using the search term "coronavirus," information posted on the first 100 English language websites was identified. Using an online readability calculator, multiple readability tests were conducted to ensure a comprehensive representation would result. RESULTS: The mean readability scores ranged between grade levels 6.2 and 17.8 (graduate school level). Four of the 5 measures (GFI, CLI, SMOG, FRE) found that readability exceeded the 10th grade reading level indicating that the text of these websites would be difficult for the average American to read. The mean reading level for nearly all noncommercial and commercial websites was at or above the 10th grade reading level. CONCLUSIONS: Messages about COVID-19 must be readable at an "easy" level, and must contain clear guidelines for behavior. The degree to which individuals seek information in response to risk messages is positively related to the expectation that the information will resolve uncertainty. However, if the information is too complex to interpret and it fails to lead to disambiguation, this can contribute to feelings of panic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Health Literacy/standards , Public Health/methods , COVID-19/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Literacy/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Internet/instrumentation , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Public Health/standards , Social Media/standards , Social Media/statistics & numerical data , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL